对“五四新文化”运动如何评说，80年代后期以来，就其正偏是非，成败得失，虽不断有学者对之进行分析，比较商讨。但从20世纪“世界文化”潮流的背景上看，“五四新文化”运动发生是必然的，它与传统“断裂”的深层问题，是一种“革命”，是众望所归的文化转型，是对传统的超越，是重建新的文化价值的前提。然而“断裂”又不是“断裂”，而是通过“断裂”达到新的意义的“弥合”，由于“分离”而“回归”，是中国文学在20世纪经历的一段特殊旅程。 Since the late 1980s, it has been right and wrong and its success or failure has won or failed. Although some scholars have carried out analysis and comparative discussions on the new culture of May Fourth Movement, However, from the background of the trend of “world culture” in the 20th century, it is inevitable that the “May Fourth New Culture Movement” took place. It is a kind of “revolution” with the traditional “break” The transcendence of tradition is the precondition of rebuilding new cultural values. However, “fracture” is not a “fracture”, but a “bridge” that achieves a new meaning through “fracture” and a “return” due to “separation.” This is a special journey that Chinese literature has undergone in the 20th century.