在经历了选题、撰写研究方案后,锡山高中再次迎来了崔允漷教授带领的华东师大专家团队,进行了开题报告6个子课题的答辩。答辩会现场气氛热烈,宽敞的会议室甚至有点“人满为患”。针对一些问题,由专家组与课题组的对话变成了全场性的大讨论。在碰撞、批判、辩驳中,一个个课题研究思路进一步澄清,研究内容、研究方法进一步明晰。夜幕降临,华灯初上。历时五个多小时的开题答辩,尽管感到饥肠辘辘,身体疲劳,大家还是异常兴奋。于是,在正式答辩结束的当儿,没有“赶得上趟”的老师们马上向专家介绍自己的课题,希望获得指导。直至晚饭时分,大家还在忘情地讨论……遗憾的是,限于篇幅所限,我们无法向读者朋友全面展示现场的精彩、生动与热烈,本期“评价如何促进学习”选择了围绕语文组夏雷震老师《高中生基于评分规则的作文自评量规设计初探》的研究方案展开的研讨,努力地将当时老师们“醉心学问”的场景呈现给大家,以期读者有所启发,有所感悟。 After experiencing the selected topic and writing the research project, Xishan Senior High School once again welcomed the team of East China Normal University experts led by Prof. Cui Yunxun and conducted a reply on the 6 sub-topics of the opening report. The scene of the conference was warm and the spacious conference room was even “overcrowded.” In response to some issues, the dialogue between the expert group and the task force has become a grand debate. In the collision, criticism and rebuttal, the research ideas of each subject are further clarified, the contents of research and research methods are further clarified. Night falls, Chinese lanterns early. It lasted more than five hours of the opening defense, despite the feeling of hunger, physical fatigue, we are still very excited. So, at the end of the formal defense, teachers who did not “catch up” immediately introduced their subject to the experts and wanted guidance. Until dinner, we still forget to discuss ... ... Unfortunately, due to space limitations, we can not fully reflect the audience to the wonderful, lively and enthusiastic audience, this issue “Evaluation of how to promote learning ” chose to focus on the language Group Xia Lei Zhen teacher “high school students based on the grading rules of essay self-assessment rules and regulations to explore the design of” research programs, and strive to teachers were “intoxicated learning” scene presented to everyone, readers are inspired, there are Feelings.