《史学理论研究》的30年历程,回顾起来,有两点印象很深:一是它注意坚守唯物史观的主导地位。理论思潮中凡是涉及重大的根本性的是非问题,总能见到它发出重头文章,旗帜鲜明地维护唯物史观的主导地位。二是它越来越重视对多样的史学理论和方法的探讨。它的版面和栏目中,除了探讨唯物史观的理论和方法的文章,我们越来越多地看到论述外国史学和中国传统史学的理论和方 In retrospect, the 30-year history of “the study of historical science” has two profound points: First, it pays attention to sticking to the dominant position of historical materialism. Anything in the theoretical trend that involves a fundamental fundamental non-issue can always be seen in the fact that it has issued an important article with a clear-cut banner and maintained its dominance in the historical materialism. Second, it places more and more emphasis on the exploration of various theories and methods of history. In its pages and columns, in addition to the articles that explore the theories and methods of historical materialism, we increasingly see the theory and methodology of foreign historiography and Chinese traditional history