论文部分内容阅读
尿路感染的治疗,目前仍有争论,自1979年Fang等提出采用单剂量抗菌药物一次性给药治疗女性尿路感染,曾为不少学者确认为是一种有效的疗法。这与常规所谓标准疗法(又称2周疗法)和低剂量长程疗法(以下简称多剂量疗法)相比,显示给药方便、医疗费用低、副作用减少,病人易接受并且有助于尿路感染定位等优点。美国学者John等复习了1967年以来有关无并发症的尿路感染治疗的14篇文献,其中12篇认为单剂疗法与多剂量常规治疗法一样有效。Schultz(1984)报告了经随机治疗的136例尿路感染患者采用复方新诺明单剂一次性口服,其疗效与多剂量
Treatment of urinary tract infection, there are still controversial, since 1979, Fang and other proposed single-dose antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infections, once for many scholars have been identified as an effective therapy. This is in contrast to the conventional so-called standard therapy (also known as 2-week therapy) and low-dose long-term therapy (hereinafter referred to as multidose therapy), which shows convenient administration, low medical costs, reduced side effects, patient acceptance and help with urinary tract infections Positioning and other advantages. American scholar John reviewed 14 articles on uncomplicated urinary tract infections since 1967, of which 12 considered monotherapy as effective as multiple doses of conventional therapy. Schultz (1984) reported that 136 patients with urinary tract infection randomized to receive a single dose of cotrimoxazole single-time oral administration, its efficacy and multiple doses