论文部分内容阅读
心证的这一过程包括了不得不存在的诸多主观因素。由于客观证据本身无法完全重塑案情,将证据进行串联使之形成完整链条进而得到确信的过程就必须要依仗法官的主观思维。这在一方面有利于案件解决的同时,也势必在另一方面对判决的客观性造成了威胁。特别是在刑事诉讼中,主观的程度一旦失控,盲目质疑将放任犯罪,随意轻信又会造成冤假错案,危险极大。本文就从保护被告人的角度提出对法官裁量权进行限缩的些许设想。要指出的是,这并非对刑事犯罪行为的放任,而是仅就心证层面提出的限制,绝不否认已收集客观证据的证明。
Evidence of this process includes the existence of many subjective factors. Since the objective evidence itself can not completely reshape the case, it is necessary to rely on the subjective thinking of judges in order to form a complete chain of evidence so as to obtain a confident process. While this is conducive to solving the case on the one hand, it will inevitably on the other hand pose a threat to the objectivity of the judgment. Especially in criminal proceedings, once the degree of subjective control is out of control, blindly questioning will allow criminals to commit crimes. This article puts forward some tentative suggestions on how to limit the discretion of judges from the angle of defending defendants. It should be pointed out that this is not a laissez-faire act on criminal offenses, but merely a restriction on the level of evidentiality, and no denying that evidence of objective evidence has been collected.