论文部分内容阅读
域外立法对合法委托与违法委托两种情形下受托人与第三人之间的民事责任分配确立了完整的规则,其规则在很大程度上秉持了受益人最大利益的理念,但仍然存在某些缺陷。我国《信托法》仅规定了合法委托时受托人的责任承担规则,有失妥当,有必要根据信托法的基本原理并借鉴比较法上的合理做法予以修正和完善。一是将合法委托时受托人的严格责任修正为过错责任,并增订违法委托时受托人的严格责任;二是增订合法委托时第三人的过错责任,并分别增订违法委托时第三人的过错责任与连带责任:若第三人明知或应知受托人的委托为违法委托,其应当与受托人承担连带责任;若第三人不知也不应当知道受托人的委托为违法委托,则仅就其处理信托事务的行为承担过错责任。
Extraterritorial legislation establishes complete rules for the distribution of civil liability between the trustee and the third party in both the legal and illegal entrustment. The rules largely uphold the notion of the beneficiaries’ Some defects. The “Trust Law” of our country only stipulates the rules of assuming responsibility when the trustee is legally entrusted. If there is any fault, it is necessary to revise and perfect it according to the basic principles of the trust law and using the reasonable practices of the comparative law. One is to modify the strict liability of trustee when legally commissioned to be the fault liability and to increase the strict liability of the trustee when commissioned illegally; the other is to increase the third party’s liability for fault when the legal commission is entrusted; and the third party Liability for fault and joint and several liability: If the third party knows or should know the trust entrusted by the trustee for the illegal entrustment, it shall be jointly and severally liable with the trustee; if the third party does not know nor should it be known that the trustee’s commission is illegal, then only Take responsibility for fault in handling trust affairs.