关于戴振祥案罪与非罪的讨论,本刊收到全国各地的大量来信来稿,限于篇幅,不能一一刊登。在此谨致谢意。下面我们摘要刊登其中的部分文章,供读者参考。截至发稿时,我们仅收到一篇认为戴振祥有罪的文章(作者是天津市中级人民法院刑二庭张吉堂)。对此文,我们不作删节,全文予以发表。 On the discussion of the case of Da Zhenxiang on charges of crime and non-crime, the journal received a great deal of letters and letters from all over the country. Due to limited space, it can not be published one by one. Thank you very much. Below we summarize some of the articles for readers reference. As of press time, we only received an article that found guilty of Dai Zhenxiang (the author is Tianjin Intermediate People’s Court sentence two court Zhang Jitang). For this article, we will not abridge the full text to be published.