论文部分内容阅读
以我国制造业企业为例,本文考察了GVC治理模式、升级与企业绩效三者之间的关系,从而检验了现有的理论与案例研究所蕴涵的4种对接模式。问卷调查与计量分析的结果显示:俘获型与层级型治理模式有助于企业较快地实现工艺升级和产品升级,但进一步升级的空间较小,因而不利于绩效提高;均衡网络型治理模式下企业升级速度稍慢,但功能升级和链升级的空间较大,有利于绩效提高;NVC中均衡网络型治理对企业升级和绩效提高没有明显的作用,而俘获型和层级型治理更有利于企业的升级和绩效提高。基于上述结论,本文强调单纯地基于GVC代工体系或NVC企业集群的工业化道路都不是中西部地区的最优选择,两者的结合可能更为现实。
Taking manufacturing enterprises in China as an example, this paper examines the relationship between GVC governance mode, promotion and enterprise performance, and then examines the four docking modes implied in the existing theories and case studies. The results of questionnaire and econometric analysis show that the capture and hierarchical governance modes can help enterprises to realize the process upgrade and product upgrade faster, but the space for further upgrade is small, which is not conducive to performance improvement. Under the balanced network governance mode Enterprise upgrade speed is slightly slower, but functional upgrade and chain upgrade have more room to improve performance; Equilibrium network management in NVC has no obvious effect on enterprise upgrade and performance improvement, while capture-type and hierarchical governance are more conducive to the enterprise The upgrade and performance improvement. Based on the above conclusions, this article emphasizes that the industrialization path based solely on the GVC foundry system or the NVC enterprise cluster is not the optimal choice in the central and western regions, and the combination of the two may be more realistic.