论文部分内容阅读
围产儿死亡率是妇幼保健工作中一项十分重要的指标,它直接反映了一个地区的妇幼保健工作的质量和卫生保健水平。我县1986年出生7332人,围产儿死亡154人,死亡率为21‰;1987年出生7690人,围产儿死亡是204人,死亡率为26.3‰,两年的围产儿死亡率从表面上看,已经低于甲类地区的指标要求,但根据我县目前的保健和医疗基础,就是作出极大的努力,也是无法达到这个水平的。我们于1988年4月份,采取随机抽样的方法,复核了3个乡16个村的围产儿死亡情况,结果证实存在着比较严重的漏报情况,三个乡抽查复核结果见表: 从表中可以看出16个村复核后围产儿死亡率为41‰,漏报率是58％,出生漏报率为33.69％,死亡漏报是相当严重的,由于这些不准确的数据,给围产期保健提供
Perinatal mortality is a very important indicator of MCH work, which directly reflects the quality of maternal and child health care work and the level of health care in a region. In 1986, 7332 people were born in our county. There were 154 perinatal deaths and the mortality rate was 21 per thousand. In 1990, there were 7,690 births, and perinatal deaths were 204 and the death rate was 26.3 per thousand. On the surface, the perinatal mortality rate , Has been lower than the requirements of the indicators of a region, but according to my county’s current health and medical basis, is to make great efforts, but also can not reach this level. In April 1988, we conducted a random sample survey to check the perinatal deaths in 16 villages in 3 townships. As a result, we found that there was a serious omission. The results of the three townships random checks were shown in the table below: It can be seen that after the review of 16 villages, the perinatal mortality rate is 41 ‰, the false negative rate is 58% and the false negative rate at birth is 33.69%. The underestimation of death is quite serious. Due to these inaccurate data, Health care provided