论文部分内容阅读
公证效力主要是指债权文书强制执行力、证据效力、法律行为要件的构成效力等。这三种效力的发挥都需具备一定的条件,在这三种效力的共同作用下,我国才能实现社会的公平正义,促进社会信用体系的两性发展。但目前我国对公证效力理解方面还存在误区,这无疑对社会信用体系的建设极为不利。因此,本文首先申明了研究公证效力存在误区及应对策略的意义。又在此基础上指出了公证书能否免于质证的误区及应对策略、执行证书制度方面存在的误区及应对策略、不动产交易中公证前置程序方面存在的误区及应对策略。希望以此减少我国公证效力存在的误区,为我国经济文化建设提供更加完善的法律保障。
Notarization effectiveness mainly refers to the enforceability of debt instruments, the effectiveness of evidence, the legal validity of the elements of the composition and so on. All these three kinds of effectiveness need to have certain conditions. Under the joint action of these three kinds of effectiveness, our country can realize social fairness and justice and promote the gender development of the social credit system. However, there are still some misunderstandings in our understanding of the validity of notarization, which is undoubtedly unfavorable to the construction of social credit system. Therefore, this article first affirms the significance of studying the misunderstanding and coping strategies of notarization effectiveness. On this basis, it points out the misunderstandings and coping strategies of whether the notarial certificate can be avoided from the cross-examination, the misunderstandings and coping strategies of the implementation of the certificate system, the misunderstandings and coping strategies of notary procedures in the real estate transactions. Hoping to reduce the misunderstanding of our country’s notarization effectiveness and provide a more complete legal guarantee for the construction of our country’s economy and culture.