论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】不能仅凭票据交付即认定成立质押,应综合考虑设质合意是否实际达成,以判断票据设质法律行为能否成立。□案号一审:(2014)嘉民二(商)初字第484号二审:(2014)沪二中民六(商)终字第116号【案情】原告(二审被上诉人):张家港市新金玛纺织有限公司(以下简称新金玛公司)。被告(二审上诉人):上海凯畅国际货物运输代理有限公司(以下简称凯畅公司)。2012年11月21日,新金玛公司与案外人居鑫签订出口代理合同,约定由新金玛公司为居鑫出口代理货物,居鑫按照新金玛公司出口货物开票金
The essence of the referee can not be established solely by the promissory note delivery pledge, should be considered whether the actual quality of the actual fulfillment of the bill to determine the legal nature of the establishment of the law. □ Case No. First instance: (2014) Jia Min Er (商) Chu Zi No. 484 Second instance: (2014) Shanghai Second People’s Sixth (Shang) No. 116 【Case】 Plaintiff (second instance appellee): Zhangjiagang New Jinma Textile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the new Jinma company). Defendant (second instance appellant): Shanghai Kaichang International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Kaichang). November 21, 2012, the new Jinma company signed an export agency contract with a foreign person Habitat Habitat, agreed by the new Jinma company for Habitat Xin export agent goods, Habitat Xin Jinma companies in accordance with the export invoice