论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨与分析在重症医学科室压疮治疗过程中应用不同清创方法的护理对策,以及临床疗效。方法:选择重症医学科室接受压疮治疗患者46例作为研究对象,这些患者之间没有显著性差异,P>0.05,具有对比性意义,因此,将这些患者进行随机分组,即观察组与对照组。随后对观察组患者给予自溶清创+保守性锐器清创治疗方案进行干预,而对对照组患者给予自溶清创治疗方案进行干预。结果:在自溶清创+保守性锐器清创治疗方案干预下的观察组,其所获得的临床总有效率为100.0%,而在自溶清创治疗方案干预下的对照组,其所获得的临床总有效率为78.3%,由此可见,两组患者之间存在着显著性差异,具有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论:通过本研究结果显示得知,重症医学科室压疮治疗活动中,自溶清创+保守性锐器清创治疗方案值得实施与推广。
Objective: To explore and analyze the nursing countermeasures of different debridement methods in the treatment of pressure ulcers in intensive care departments and to evaluate the clinical efficacy. Methods: Forty-six patients undergoing pressure ulcer treatment in the intensive care department were selected as the study subjects. There was no significant difference between these patients (P> 0.05). Therefore, these patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group . Followed by the observation group of patients given autolytic debridement + conservative debridement treatment intervention, while the control group of patients given autolytic debridement treatment intervention. Results: The total effective rate was 100.0% in the observation group under the treatment of autolytic debridement + conservative debridement and debridement treatment, while in the control group under the intervention of autolytic debridement, The total effective rate obtained was 78.3%. Thus, there was a significant difference between the two groups of patients, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study show that in intensive care unit pressure ulcer treatment activities, autolytic debridement + conservative debridement debridement treatment programs worth implementing and promotion.