论文部分内容阅读
海峡两岸经济贸易领域稳健合作、逐步融合的历史进程中,ECFA的商谈、签署和实施,是海峡两岸交流机制化的重要进展和示范样本。在两岸文化交流日益频繁但成效参差不齐、深度互动和常态持久逐步成为必然需求的基础上,“文化ECFA”逐步成为维护和保障两岸文化交流健康开展、提高两岸受益绩效和民族文化认同的紧迫选项。回顾两岸文化交流的曲折历程,可以明确民族文化认同的基本前提是文化交流协议签署的共识基础;剖析当前两岸文化交流的现状、问题,才能廓清该协议应于针对的体制机制程序构建的原则与指向。由此,着眼于现实的“机制复杂性”的正向、负向效应,汲取ECFA实践经验和两种不同理路的合理成分,海峡两岸文化交流协议适宜以“1+N”的方式加以商谈和签署,这不失为两岸文化交流机制化、规范化和法制化的路径选择。
In the historical process of steady cooperation and gradual integration in the economic and trade fields across the Taiwan Strait, the negotiation, signing and implementation of ECFA are important progress and model samples for the exchange and institutionalization across the Taiwan Strait. On the basis of the increasingly frequent cross-Strait cultural exchanges but with uneven results, deep interaction and steady normalization, the “cultural ECFA” has gradually become the key to safeguarding and safeguarding the healthy development of cross-Strait cultural exchanges and enhancing cross-Strait performance and ethnic cultural identity Pressing option. Looking back at the twists and turns of cross-Strait cultural exchanges, we can clearly define the basic premise of national cultural identity as the consensus basis for the signing of cultural exchange agreements. Analyzing the status quo and problems of the current cross-Strait cultural exchanges can we clearly outline the principles and principles direction. Therefore, focusing on the positive and negative effects of realistic “mechanism complexity”, drawing on the practical experience of ECFA and the rational components of the two different approaches, the agreement on cross-Strait cultural exchange is suitable for “1 + N” Way to discuss and sign, after all, this can be regarded as a path of institutionalization, standardization and legalization of cross-Strait cultural exchanges.