论文部分内容阅读
在性骚扰案件中,难以收集到有效证据的问题一度被认为是妥当解决这类争议的最大障碍。通过对海峡两岸法院就两起性骚扰案件的审理进行比较研究后发现,人们的这种“共识”实际上只反应了问题的一个方面,而问题的另一个重要方面在于我国大陆地区法院的法官过分追求直接证据与经验法则的不妥当运用,这主要源于法官性别平等视角的缺乏并由此而产生了错误的解释框架。
In cases of sexual harassment, the difficulty of collecting valid evidence was once considered the single biggest obstacle to the proper resolution of such disputes. After a comparative study of two cases of sexual harassment by courts across the Taiwan Strait, it has been found that such “consensus” of people actually reflects only one aspect of the problem. Another important aspect of the problem lies in the fact that the courts in mainland China Judge’s excessive pursuit of the improper use of direct evidence and the rule of thumb mainly stems from the lack of judge’s perspective of gender equality and the resulting wrong interpretation framework.