论文部分内容阅读
日前,被扣压韩国济州岛多日后,海航旗下“海娜”号邮轮终于抵达天津港。一场持续了76小时的海事事件让“海事仲裁管理”进入普通民众的视野。原本是两家企业普通的债务纠纷,缘何闹得满世界风雨?明明是两家中国国内企业的纠纷,却为什么要跑到韩国解决呢?有法律专家表示:此案的法律关系很复杂。通过扣船实现担保,以便将来执行胜诉判决或仲裁裁决,是海事索赔中特有的做法。由于船舶的流动性,它可能在不同的国家之间运行,因海事请求权的存在,或已经生效的法院判决和仲裁裁决的存在,船舶就有可能在任何有管辖权的法院被扣押。就此,全球风险管控专家苏黎世财产保险(中国)有限公司海运部高级经理张艳强
Recently, many days after being withheld Jeju Island, South Korea, HNA’s “Hai Na” cruise ship finally arrived in Tianjin Port. A 76-hour maritime incident brought “maritime arbitration administration” into the eyes of the general public. Originally a common debt dispute between two companies, why is it troubled by the turmoil in the world? It is obviously a dispute between two Chinese domestic enterprises, but why should they go to South Korea? Some legal experts said the legal relationship in the case is very complicated. It is a unique practice in maritime claims that a guarantee be secured through the arrest of a ship so that a successful judgment or arbitral award can be enforced in the future. Due to the mobility of the ship, it may operate between different countries. It is possible that a ship may be detained in any court of competent jurisdiction because of the existence of a maritime claim, or the existence of a valid court judgment and arbitral award. In response, Zhang Yanqiang, senior risk manager of the global risk management expert Zurich Property Insurance (China) Co., Ltd.,