论文部分内容阅读
本文认为 2 0世纪三四十年代是中国人类学的“古典时代”,在田野方法、理论探索等方面都达到了极高的学术水准。 80年代人类学的恢复与重建及 90年代人类学的复兴 ,均有一个对“古典时代”的接续过程。我们倡导重返“古典时代”,努力做好两方面的工作 :一是重新认识和评价这一时期的作品 ;二是对这些旧著的调研地点进行学术重访 ,撰写新的田野著述。本文以台头为例 ,对上述诸问题进行讨论 ,以期引起同仁的关注和重视。
This paper argues that the 1930s and 1940s of the 20th century were the “classical times” of Chinese anthropology and reached extremely high academic standards in field methods and theoretical exploration. The recovery and reconstruction of anthropology in the 1980s and the revival of anthropology in the 1990s all have a continuation of the “classical era.” We advocate returning to the “classical era,” and strive to do a good job in two aspects: one is to re-understand and evaluate the works of this period; the other is to re-visit these old research sites and write new field writings. This article takes the example of the first stage to discuss the above issues with a view to arousing the concern and attention of my colleagues.