论文部分内容阅读
商品交换过程是以劳动价值作为载体还是以产权契约作为载体这个问题在传统政治经济学研究中尚缺乏系统的比较分析。商品交换的劳动价值说与产权契约说的理论渊源不尽一致,比较研究的根本除了搞清商品交换价值说和产权说的理念与脉络特征外,还应就其可能引发的市场经济理念和模式进行深入辨析。中国30余年来的市场化改革历程,既包括强调劳动价值的时期,也包括强调产权契约的时期,社会主义市场经济模式并未完全定型。面对2020年建成更加完善的社会主义市场经济体制的目标,我们在劳动价值和产权契约的选择上,既要权衡利弊,又要推陈出新:既尊重劳动价值又尊重产权契约的社会主义市场经济模式可以成为我国市场化改革向纵深推进的新思路,以更好地实现市场经济在资源配置过程中的决定性作用。
Whether the commodity exchange process takes the labor value as the carrier or the property right contract as the carrier has not been systematically analyzed in the traditional political economy. The theoretical origin of the labor value of commodity exchange and the theory of property rights contract are not consistent. The fundamental of comparative research should not only clarify the concept and characteristics of the commodity exchange value theory and property rights, but also discuss the market economy concepts and models In-depth analysis. The course of marketization reform in China over the past 30 years includes not only the period of emphasizing labor value but also the period of emphasizing the title of property rights. The socialist market economy model has not been completely finalized. Faced with the goal of building a more complete socialist market economic system in 2020, we must weigh the pros and cons as well as innovate the labor value and the contract of property rights: a socialist market economy that respects both labor value and property rights It can be a new way of pushing forward the marketization reform in our country in order to better realize the decisive role of the market economy in the process of resource allocation.