笔者注意到,在新近的贵刊上,有读者建议,贵刊选用稿件的面是否再宽泛些,不要老是集中于几副“老面孔”。该建议当然是有一定道理和积极意义的。但笔者觉得,在这一问题上,宜“两分法”看待,两头兼顾,切莫顾此失彼。具体来说,一方面,希望各位编辑对那些“新面孔”来稿,要格外认真地看阅,力求沙里淘金,着力扶持。切莫采取平均主 The author noticed that in the recent expensive periodicals, some readers suggested that whether or not your magazine’s selection of manuscripts should be more broad should not always be concentrated on several “old faces.” Of course, the proposal has some truth and positive meaning. However, I think that on this issue, we should treat the “dichotomy” as a two-pronged approach. Specifically, on the one hand, I hope all editors will make contributions to those “new faces.” They should read with earnestness and strive to support Shali Gold Rush. Do not take the average master