论文部分内容阅读
编者:这篇谈武术历史的文章,以“史料”为主,而这些史料又是得自当事人在五六十年前亲笔写下的白纸黑字,尤为难得。此文较之当下一些研究者道听途说、人云亦云的信口道来,应该更具阅读和研究的价值。中国的武林,有很多奇怪的事情耐人寻味,而现今诸多经不起追根溯源的闪烁其词,让这些原本可能并不奇怪的事情变得扑朔迷离,难辨真伪。因此,编者更愿意读这种用史料来叙述的历史,欣赏作者紧紧把握和依靠史料做历史研究的求实精神。
Editor: This article on the history of martial arts is mainly based on “historical data”, which is especially rare because of the black and white characters written by the parties personally in 1950s and 1960s. Compared with some researchers nowadays hearing this passage, people are saying the word of mouth should be more reading and research value. There are a lot of weird things in Chinese martial arts that are intriguing. Nowadays, many people who can not afford to trace their roots can make these things that may not have been strange to be confusing and difficult to distinguish authenticity. Therefore, the editor is more willing to read this history to describe the history, enjoy the author firmly grasp and rely on historical data to do historical research and realistic spirit.