论文部分内容阅读
我是一个长期处在教学第一线的教师,看到了一些做法令人痛心。今摘取几则,以示大家。 一、折算评比 期末县、学区教学效果评比规定:中心校学生参评数=学生总数×90%,完小校、初小校学生参评数=学生总数×85%。这样折算评比,那些10%—15%的差生即使考零分也不会影响评比,无需转化,因此,他们常被有些老师列为“不治之症”,不愿下药,并安排他们长期坐“特座”。这样的评比自然造成差生越越差,
I am a teacher who has been on the forefront of teaching for a long time and saw some of the practices are heartbreaking. Let’s pick a few to show everyone. First, the discount evaluation The end of the county, school district teaching effectiveness rating rules: the number of students participating in the central school = the total number of students × 90%, the number of students participating in primary and secondary schools, primary and secondary schools × 85% of the total number of students. In this way, those 10% to 15% of poor students will not affect the competition even if the test score is zero, and they do not need to be converted. Therefore, they are often referred to as “incurable diseases” by some teachers, and they are reluctant to take drugs and arrange for them to sit for a long time.” Special seat." This appraisal naturally causes worse and worse students.