论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨三野微创食管切除治疗食管癌与康复手术的疗效对比。方法:将2015年1月~2016年12月在我院进行治疗的88例食管癌患者作为研究对象,并将其按照随机数字发分成观察组44例与对照组44例,观察组患者给予三野微创食管切除治疗,对照组患者给予康复手术治疗,分别对两组患者的临床疗效、手术指标及并发症情况进行统计对比。结果:两组患者的临床疗效差异不明显,手术指标方面两组患者的手术时间差异不明显,但观察组患者的出血量、胸管留置时间及出院时间均明显低于对照组患者,同时观察组患者的并发症发生率明显低于对照组。结论:三野微创食管切除在食管癌治疗中的临床疗效与康复手术同样确切,同时该术式造成的创伤更小,患者术后恢复更快,临床应用价值更高,值得临床的推广及应用。
Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effects of three-field minimally invasive esophagectomy on esophageal cancer and rehabilitation. Methods: 88 patients with esophageal cancer who were treated in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were selected as research objects. According to the random number, 44 patients were divided into observation group and 44 patients in control group. Patients in observation group were given San Ye Minimally invasive esophagectomy, the control group of patients given rehabilitation surgery, respectively, the clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients, surgical indicators and complications were statistically compared. Results: There was no significant difference in clinical curative effect between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups in terms of operation indexes. However, the amount of bleeding, chest tube indwelling time and discharge time in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group The complication rate in the group of patients was significantly lower than that in the control group. Conclusions: SanNano minimally invasive esophagectomy in the treatment of esophageal cancer clinical efficacy and rehabilitation the same exact surgery at the same time, the trauma caused by smaller, faster postoperative recovery in patients with higher clinical value, is worthy of clinical promotion and application .