论文部分内容阅读
我国台湾地区于2003年施行投资人保护法,设立有权代表投资人提起证券团体诉讼之投资人保护中心,有别于以私人主导集团诉讼为主轴之美国,以及于传统公权体制中谋求改革之德国,于各种团体诉讼制度中独树一帜。大陆在朝向完全交由主要投资人及律师主导之美国集团诉讼制度前,或可与台湾地区相同,先设立投保中心此一暂时性、任务型机构,等待市场及时机成熟。有鉴于大陆地区证券诉讼目前限于不实陈述案件、且数量显有不足,由半官方组织作为此类诉讼之推手,可避免开放速度过快,造成市场混乱之情形,亦可达成投资人保护之目的。因此,台湾地区投保中心之实践及改革刍议,或可供大陆地区证券团体诉讼制度未来进行改革之参考。
In Taiwan, China implemented the investor protection law in 2003 and established an investor protection center that has the power to file securities group litigation on behalf of investors. Unlike the United States, which is dominated by private leading group litigation, and reforms are sought in the traditional public-power system Germany, is unique in various corporate litigation systems. Before moving toward the U.S. group litigation system completely dominated by major investors and lawyers, or similar to Taiwan’s, mainland China first set up a temporary and task-oriented institution that would wait for the market to mature on time. Given that securities litigation in the mainland is currently limited to cases of misrepresentation and there are insufficient numbers, it is possible for a semi-official to act as a promoter of such litigation to avoid the situation of too fast opening up and causing market confusion and to achieve investor protection purpose. Therefore, the practice and reform of the insurance center in Taiwan, or a reference for the future reform of the litigation system of securities corporations in the mainland.