论文部分内容阅读
2004年中考化学试卷一个重要特点是:使用国家教育部颁布的《全日制义务教育化学课程标准》编写的教材进行教学的同学中考化学科使用的是“课改实验区”试卷,而沿用《全日制义务教育化学教学大纲》编写的教材进行教学的同学,使用“非课改实验区”化学试卷.这两种试卷有什么异同?题目差异如何?给教学带来怎样的启示?笔者以河北、山东、江西、广东、广西、贵州等6省区的课改实验区化学试卷(简称课改卷),与之相对应的非课改实验区化学试卷(简称非课改卷)作研究样例.从试卷的总体评价和命题策略两个维度进行比较.
An important feature of the 2004 intermediate entrance examination chemistry examination paper is that the students who use the teaching materials prepared by the “Full-time Compulsory Education Chemistry Curriculum Standards” promulgated by the Ministry of National Education to teach the students are used in the “Experimental Zone for Experimental Courses” test, and are still in use. Students in the teaching materials compiled in the “Full-time Compulsory Education Chemistry Syllabus” use the “non-curriculum experimentation area” and "chemical test papers. What are the similarities and differences between these two papers? How do the topics differ? What kind of enlightenment is given to teaching? The author uses the chemical experiment papers in the experimental areas of Hebei Province, Shandong Province, Jiangxi Province, Guangdong Province, Guangxi Autonomous Region and Guizhou Province (abbreviated as Curriculum Reform Papers), and the corresponding non-curriculum reform experimental area chemistry papers (referred to as non-curriculum textbooks). As a sample study, compare the overall evaluation of the test paper and the propositional strategy.