论文部分内容阅读
义疏,即“以一部经注为主,在此基础上,对经注文所涉及的内容再详加解说、补充、修正、阐释、发挥。”[1]若以此观点为参照,皇侃《论语义疏》的体例特色有二:一是就皇侃的整个文本与大部分疏文而言的“疏”之特色。二是仅就皇侃的小部分疏文、其所加案语及一些新添魏晋南朝新注而言的“义”之特色。更为重要的是,皇侃将两汉经学“训解”与魏晋“义解”熔铸在同一处疏文中,通过“训解”的注解形式达到“义解”《论语》、创新《论语》思想的诠释目的。这种兼容乃至糅合(将
On the basis of this, on the basis of the contents of the note through further explanation, supplement, amendment, interpretation and play. “[1] If this point of view as a reference There are two characteristics of Huang Kan’s theory of semantic meaning: First, the whole text of Huang Kan and the characteristic of ”Shu“ in most of the texts. The second is only a small part of the Huang Kan Kan-wen, its added case and some new addition of Wei, Jin and South Dynasties new note in terms of ”justice “ characteristics. More importantly, Huang Kan casts the two Han sutras ”Mediation“ and Wei and Jin Dynasties into ”the same meaning“ in the same place, through ”annotation“ to ”righteousness solution" The Analects of Confucius, the Purpose of Innovating the Analects of Confucius. This compatibility and even blend (will