论文部分内容阅读
《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》一经出台,就在理论和实务界引发热烈的讨论,尤其第十条关于一物二卖问题的规定引来了诸多批判。该司法解释虽然是买卖合同司法解释,解决的是债权债务关系,但是一物二卖问题与财产的物权却具有着天然不可分割的联系。本文以特殊动产船舶为切入点,从船舶物权变动效力角度出发,试对《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》第十条做出分析。
The promulgation of the Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation on the Applicable Law to the Trial of Cases of Dispute over Sale and Purchase Contracts has triggered heated discussions in both theory and practice. In particular, the article 10 on the sale of goods and one thing leads to many criticisms. Although the judicial interpretation of the judicial interpretation of the contract of sale and purchase, the solution is the relationship between claims and debts, but the problem of one thing or two and the real right of property have a natural and indivisible connection. In this paper, the special movable property ship is taken as an entry point. From the perspective of the validity of the changes in the property right of the ship, the article tries to analyze Article 10 of “Interpretation of the Supreme People ’s Court on the Applicable Law in the Trial of Dispute over the Sale and Purchase Contract”.