论文部分内容阅读
“朱、陆异同”问题的争论是宋明学术史上的重头戏。“鹅湖之会”开了和会朱、陆的先河。在和会朱、陆历程中,徽州学者作出了重要的理论贡献。郑玉认为朱、陆之学各有优劣,应取长补短;赵汸认为朱、陆思想“合并于暮岁”;程敏政提出朱、陆“早异晚同”说,并著《道一编》论证之,其思想影响王阳明及其后学,王阳明“因之遂有《朱子晚年定论》之录”。程敏政关于朱、陆“早异晚同”的思想,在和会朱、陆历程中起到承前启后、引导学术走向的作用,但朱、陆“晚同”并不符合朱子晚年思想实际,却表现出程敏政援朱入陆的思想倾向。
The debate over the issue of “Zhu, Lu Xun and Tong” is the highlight of academic history in the Song and Ming Dynasties. “Goose Lake will ” and will be Zhu, land precedent. In the Hui and Zhu, Lu journey, Huizhou scholars made an important theoretical contribution. Zheng Yu believes that Zhu, Lu’s school each have their own strengths and weaknesses, should learn from each other’s strengths and weaknesses; Zhao Yi think Zhu, Lu thought “merged in old age ”; Cheng Minzheng put forward Zhu, Lu Editorial “, the thought of Wang Yangming and its subsequent studies, Wang Yangming ” Therefore, there is “. Cheng Minzheng’s thought of Zhu, Lu and ”early and late same“ played the role of guiding the academic trend in the Zhuhui and Lu period of the Guihui meeting. However, Zhu and Lu ”Late Tong" did not fit the thought of Zhu Zhi in his later years In fact, it shows the mentality of Cheng Minzheng aid Zhu landing.