论文部分内容阅读
刘运喜同志《特态不定项选择题的解法》(下称《特》文,见本刊1993年第10期)所设计的解答方法,是经不起推敲的。 诚如《特》文所说,选择题作为一种客观性试题,因其答案客观、统一和规范而能较真实准确地考查应试者对知识的掌握程度与理解运用能力。可是,这类“特态”不定项选择题,恰恰“特”在不可能拟定一个客观的答案。
The solution designed by Comrade Liu Yunxi’s “Solution to the Problem of Special-State Indefinite Multiple Choice Questions” (hereinafter referred to as “Special Text”, see the Journal No. 10 of 1993) cannot withstand scrutiny. As stated in the “Special” article, multiple-choice questions, as an objective test question, can accurately and accurately examine the test taker’s mastery of knowledge and ability to use it because of its objective, uniform, and standardized answers. However, this type of “special state” indefinite multiple choice question, precisely “special” in the impossible to draw up an objective answer.