论文部分内容阅读
2011年轰动全国的反垄断案件当属电信联通涉嫌滥用市场支配地位一案。国家发改委对此案展开调查的理由是电信联通对与其有直接竞争关系的运营商和没有竞争关系的经营者、终端用户实行不同的接入价格,构成了反垄断法上的价格歧视。该理由是值得商榷的。结合国外类似案件的处理经验,笔者认为认定为价格挤压行为更为合理,其认定需考虑主体是否为具有市场支配地位的纵向一体化企业、必要投入理论、排挤效果、合理抗辩理由、实质性影响竞争等要素,而目前中国反垄断法中并未对这一行为加以规定。
The antitrust case hit the country in 2011 was undoubtedly a case of telecom over alleged abuse of market dominance. National Development and Reform Commission investigated the case on the grounds that Telecom Unicom has direct competition with its operators and non-competitive operators and end-users to implement different access prices constitute the anti-monopoly law of price discrimination. The reason is debatable. Based on the experience of handling similar cases in foreign countries, the author believes that it is more reasonable to identify the price squeezing behavior as a vertically integrated enterprise with the dominant market position, and it is necessary to consider whether the main body is a vertically integrated enterprise with market dominance. It is necessary to put theory into effect, eliminate reason reasonably and reasonably Affect the competition and other factors, and at present the Chinese antitrust law does not regulate this behavior.