论文部分内容阅读
因果关系是一种客观的事实联系,归因判断是对这种客观联系的认识,是一个纯粹的事实认定问题。侵权法理论的任务是澄清因果关系的概念,为事实认定提供一个准确的分析框架,使归因判断与客观事实相契合。传统理论将必要性等同于因果性,一方面在理论上未能正确地阐释因果关系概念的结构性要素;另一方面也未能提供任何有效的认定检验方法。以充分性取代必要性,澄清因果判断的结构性要素,重构归因判断的分析框架,为克服经典模型的缺陷提供了出路。之所以将侵权行为认定为事实原因,不是因为它是结果发生的必要条件,而是由于它构成一个对结果发生有充分性的条件集合之必要要素。
Causality is an objective factual link, and attributional judgment is the recognition of this objective connection, which is a purely factual determination. The task of tort law theory is to clarify the concept of causality, provide an accurate analytical framework for the determination of facts, and make the attribution judgment fit with objective facts. The traditional theory equates necessity with causation, on the one hand, it fails to explain the structural elements of the concept of causality correctly in theory; on the other hand, it also fails to provide any effective method of accreditation. Sufficient to replace the necessity to clarify the structural elements of causal judgments, to re-analyze the attribution of the analysis framework to overcome the shortcomings of the classic model provides a way out. The reason why the infringement was deemed a factual fact is not that it is a necessary condition for the outcome to occur, but rather that it constitutes an essential element of a set of conditions sufficient for the outcome to occur.