论文部分内容阅读
全国第二届中青年书法篆刻家作品展览的评审工作,在评委结构、评选方法、评审标准以及评审工作与理论研究相结合的形式等方面,都做了前所未有的尝试。这种尝试,无疑为切实贯彻“双百”方针,发现书法人才,做出了有意义的探索,同时也向人们展示了评审工作本身所具有的学术价值。这些评委们均来自天南海北,不仅包括了书法家、篆刻家,而且兼备了书法理论家、书法组织工作者和书法出版编辑,具有广泛的代表性。由于受各地域书风的影响,加上不同的审美趣味和不同的意识追求,也就形成了具有差异的统一体。和谐的本质就是差异。具有不同审美趣味的评委,在差异中决定了不同流派、不同风格作品的并存。评审标准总是相对的,作为艺术,也正是有了这种差异的不同一性,才真正有了评审的价值。这
The review of the works of the second middle-aged and young calligraphic and seal-writing works of the whole nation has made unprecedented attempts in the aspects of the structure of the jury, the selection method, the evaluation criteria and the form of the combination of jury work and theoretical research. This kind of attempt undoubtedly made a meaningful exploration for the practical implementation of the “double hundred” policy and the discovery of calligraphic talent, and at the same time, it also showed people the academic value of the review work itself. These judges are all over the world, including not only calligrapher, seal cutting, but also combines the calligrapher, calligrapher and calligrapher and editor, with a wide range of representation. Due to the influence of book style in different regions and different aesthetic tastes and different pursuit of consciousness, a unified body with different meanings is formed. The essence of harmony is difference. Judges with different aesthetic tastes determine the differences between different genres and different styles of works. Evaluation criteria are always relative, as art, it is precisely because of this difference of the different nature, it really has the value of the review. This