论文部分内容阅读
剩余价值在马克思主义体系中占有及其重要的地位,被恩格斯高度评价。但西方学术界并不认同这一概念,他们认为剩余价值不能精准量化所以不是一个经济学概念,所以整个主流西方经济学界否认了马克思的这一理论贡献,他们主张用“利润”概念来取代剩余价值。这种思潮对中国经济学界也带来消极影响,导致人们对剩余价值和利润认识上的混淆和迷茫。本文重点厘清剩余价值和利润的区别,试解决人们对这个问题在认识上的混乱。
Engels highly appraised the fact that the surplus value possessed and played an important role in the Marxist system. However, the western academic circles do not agree with this concept. They think that the surplus value can not be accurately quantified. Therefore, it is not an economic concept. Therefore, the mainstream mainstream western economists have denied this theoretical contribution of Marxism. They advocate the concept of “profit” Replace residual value. This trend of thinking also has a negative impact on the Chinese economics community, leading to confusion and confusion over the understanding of surplus value and profits. This article focuses on clarifying the difference between surplus value and profits and trying to resolve people’s perceptions of confusion over this issue.