论文部分内容阅读
Value judgment is at the core of civil law.This paper explores how scholars of civil law reach mutual understanding and consensus on specific value judgment by rational discussion in the context of multiple value orientation.Based on a brief evaluation of the theory of legal argument and with the basic value consensus of Chinese civil law scholars as the premise,this paper proposes two substantive rules of argumentation for scholars of civil law to discuss value judgment:First,a strong of equal treatment should be carried out in the absence of sufficient and justified reasons or otherwise;Second,the freedom of civil subject should not be restrained in the absence of sufficient and justified reasons or otherwise.To reach mutual understanding,and on the basis of that to reach new consensus on specific value judgment further,scholars of civil law should base their discussions on substantive rules of argumentation for value judgment,follow rules and forms of argumentation as procedural techniques,and apply proper methods of argumentation.This paper also explores the application of substantive rules of argumentation on two specific value judgment issues of civil law scholars.