论文部分内容阅读
多年来,我总觉得教书者应先读书,其理由有三: 一、讲解课文,若是读书不广,往往讲得不深不透,甚至讲错。 原高三语文教材有篇课文《子路、曾皙、冉有、公西华侍坐》,注释中对子路、曾皙、冉有、公西华这四个人有说明,好像是没有什么可讲的了。但“侍坐”的坐次为何先子路,后曾皙,而后冉有,最后公西华呢?若习惯于照本宣科,是难于道出个所以然的。但读过《史记·仲尼弟子列传》,则可以向学生说明:子路小孔
For many years, I always felt that there were three reasons why textbooks should be read first: First, explain the texts. If you don’t study broadly, you can’t speak in depth or even make mistakes. The original high school language textbooks have the text “Zi Lu, Zeng Zang, Zhai You, Gong Xi Hua Shi Zuo”. The notes on the four people, Zi Lu, Zeng Zhai, Zhai You, and Gong Xi Hua, explain that there is nothing to say. Now. However, why did the “waiting seated” sit on the road first and then once he was jealous, and then there was, and finally Xixihua? It would be difficult to tell why he would be used if he was used to teaching. But after reading “Historical Records of Zhong Ni Di Zi Biography”, you can explain to students: