论文部分内容阅读
各种伪定语虽然表面类似,其产生机制却不相同,因此不宜一概而论。在批判地继承以往研究的基础上,本文对汉语伪定语的产生机制进行了分类甄别,并逐一做了解释。本文认为,汉语“数+量”短语的位置历史上曾经历了一个参数重设的过程。由于参数的作用,现代汉语“数+量”短语大多只能位于名词之前,伪名量由此产生。伪领属则是派生的结果,具体分两类情况:一类是重新分析所致;另一类则是脱落代词恢复。
Although various pseudo-adverbials have similar surfaces and different mechanisms of production, they should not be generalized. On the basis of critically inheriting the previous studies, this paper classifies and classifies the production mechanism of Chinese prepositions and explains them one by one. This paper argues that the position of the Chinese “number + quantity” phrase has historically experienced a process of parameter reset. Due to the function of parameters, the majority of modern Chinese “number + quantity” phrases can only be located in front of nouns. Pseudo-genus is the result of the derivative, specifically divided into two categories: one is due to re-analysis; the other is the fall off pronoun recovery.