论文部分内容阅读
与华君兄认识十多年了,对他的艺术可谓十分熟悉,不论何时,看到他的画总有一种发自胸中的冲动,想写点文字,记录一些感受,可又感思路不甚清晰,怕谈不清楚,未敢动笔。最近读了一篇谈论中国文艺本质真实观的文章,颇有所思,想起了华君兄的创作。这篇文章指出,与西方文艺摹仿或再现生活的真实观不同,中国文艺是重在表现的,那么它的真实观究竟何在呢?文章引述了我国历代画坛上对“形似”和“神似”的种种论议和纷争,以至到宋人(邓椿)具有结论性的论断:“画之为用大矣!盈天地之间者万物·悉皆含毫运思,曲尽其态,而所以能曲尽者,一法耳。一者何也?曰:传神而已。……故画法以气韵生动为第一。”这种断论延至今天,似依旧成为认识中国诗画的权威性观念。然而,文章以为,不论“形似”还是以“气韵生动”为标准的“神似”都还是以再现客观对象本身特征为旨归,都属于再现性文艺范围,故谈不上
With Hua Junxiong know more than ten years, can be described as very familiar with his art, whenever he saw his paintings there is always a kind of impulse from the chest, want to write some words, record some feelings, but also a sense of thinking Very clear, afraid to talk about it, did not dare to write. Recently read an article on the true nature of Chinese literature and art of the article, thoughtfully, remembered the creation of Hua Junxiong. This article points out that, contrary to the real concept of imitation or reproduction of life in Western literature and art, Chinese literature and art is most important. So what exactly is its true view? This article quotes the “ God-like ”all kinds of arguments and disputes, and even to the Song (Deng Chun) conclusive conclusion: “ The big picture of everything! Therefore, we can try our best to make the most of one’s ear, and what is the meaning of one? Sexuality. However, the article holds that neither ”shape“ or ”vivid“ based on ”vivid " is still based on the objective characteristics of the objective of reproduction, all belong to the scope of reproducible literature and art, so not to mention