论文部分内容阅读
刑事诉讼行为的概念并没有成为刑事诉讼法的中心点,它是该领域研究的最小分析单位。本文不纠缠于学术谱系的考古,而从功能性原理出发,逐一讨论三个评价系统(成立性、合法性和有效性)。诉讼行为如果不成立,则不产生合法与否、有效与否的问题。三重行为象限图明晰了两组划分(“合法/不合法”和“有效/无效”)存在着交叉关系。刑事诉讼行为的程序性后果包括四种可能性:“合法无效”、“合法有效”、“不合法无效”和“不合法有效”。
The concept of criminal proceedings has not become the focus of criminal procedure law and it is the smallest unit of analysis in this field. This article does not dwell on the archeology of academic pedigree, but proceeding from the functional principle, one by one to discuss three evaluation system (establishment, legitimacy and validity). If the act of litigation is not established, then there is no issue of lawfulness, validity or not. The Triple Action Quadrant shows that there is a cross-relationship between the two groups ( “legal / invalid” and “valid / invalid ”). The procedural consequences of criminal proceedings include four possibilities: “legal invalid”, “valid”, “invalid” and “invalid”.