新课程改革之后,在一个《课程标准》的前提下,语文教材开始多元化,各地编写的语文教材在选文上的自主性加大,鲁迅的“进”与“出”就成了一个我们必须面对的现实。一些人很偏激地认为应该把鲁迅“请出”语文教材,这是因为他们自身肤浅地误读了鲁迅。一些人很坚决地主张鲁迅作品在语文教材中的“霸主”地位,这是因为他们对鲁迅精神的深刻理解与膜拜。我觉得应该理性地去看待这个问题。 After the reform of the new curriculum, under the premise of a “curriculum standard”, Chinese teaching materials began to be diversified. The autonomy of the textbooks written in various places increased in the selected texts. Lu Xun's “Into” and “Into” It has become a reality that we must face. Some people are overly excited to think that Lu Xun should “please” out of language teaching materials, because they superficially misread Lu Xun. Some people are firmly advocating the work of Lu Xun's “dominant” position in Chinese textbooks because of their profound understanding and worship of Lu Xun's spirit. I think we should take a rational look at this issue.