论文部分内容阅读
在挪用公款罪中,挪用对象因过于狭窄已难以适应社会需要,本文从挪用行为的社会危害性等角度考虑,认为应将普通公物纳入挪用型犯罪的挪用对象;对于多次挪用公款并以后次挪用归还前次的行为,在定案金额的确定上,应以单次挪用行为构成犯罪为前提累积计算;对主张取消挪用公款罪中的“用途要件”的观点,从刑法体例、条文之间的统一、挪与用的关系等角度逐一予以反驳,坚持使用用途、数额及时间作为该项犯罪构成要件的必要性。
In the crime of embezzlement, the object of embezzlement has been difficult to adapt to the needs of society due to being too narrow. Based on the social harmfulness of embezzlement, this article thinks ordinary public property should be included in the appropriation object of embezzlement crime. For misappropriation of public funds, The misappropriation of the previous act, in determining the amount of the fixed, should be a single embezzlement constitute a crime as the premise cumulative calculation; advocated the abolition of embezzlement of the “use of elements” point of view, from the criminal law, the provisions of The unity between the move and the use of the relationship between the one by one to refute, insist on the use of the amount and time as a necessity of the elements of the crime.