论文部分内容阅读
目的:应用GE掌上彩色超声诊断仪(Vscan)对心血管内科患者进行常规检查,探讨其卫生经济学价值。方法:对385例心内科新入院患者分别用GE掌上彩色超声诊断仪和普通超声心动仪常规检查。观察两者时间成本和经济成本的差异,评估不同成本与效果之间的关系。结果:掌上彩色超声诊断仪与普通超声心动仪检查结果较为一致。患者入院时间距掌上彩色超声诊断仪检查时间平均为2h14min,距普通超声心动仪检查时间平均43h28min。结论:掌上彩色超声诊断仪诊断结果与普通超声心动仪基本一致,如果应用到门诊和急诊筛查,可节省时间和费用。
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a routine examination of cardiovascular patients using GE handheld color ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus (Vscan) to explore the value of their health economics. Methods: A total of 385 new cardiologists admitted to the hospital were examined by GE handheld color ultrasound system and conventional echocardiography. Observe the difference between the time cost and the economic cost, and evaluate the relationship between different costs and effects. Results: The PDA color ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and general echocardiography test results are more consistent. Patient admission time from the palm of the color ultrasound diagnostic time average of 2h14min, from the average echocardiographic examination time average 43h28min. Conclusion: The diagnostic results of the handheld color ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus are basically the same as those of general echocardiography, which saves time and expense if applied to clinic and emergency screening.