论文部分内容阅读
对话,是干群之间思想交流的一条重要渠道。然而,对话也应讲究艺术,既要注意方式方法,又要注意感情的交融。否则,有了对话的形式,未必能收到良好的效果。某农场日前举行了一次干群对话,笔者认为就不太讲究艺术,所以效果也难如人意。原因是:第一,领导未放下架子,缺乏平等待人之意,致使对话气氛很严肃;第二,领导一言堂。按理说,对话应是双向交流。光领导讲话,群众的真实思想就无法反映出来;第三,在谈话方式方法上还不能入情入理,仍用大道理生硬地说教,群众不买你的帐。结果职工反映说:“这样的对话今后再也不参加了。”无论是做思想政治工作还
Dialogue is an important channel for the exchange of ideas between cadres and masses. However, dialogue should also pay attention to the arts, it is necessary to pay attention to ways and means, but also pay attention to the blending of feelings. Otherwise, with the form of dialogue, it may not be able to receive good results. Recently, a farm held a dialogue between cadres and the masses. I think it is not very particular about art, so the effect is also unsatisfactory. The reasons are as follows: First, the leaders have not let go of their shelves and the lack of equal treatment leads to a very serious dialogue. Second, there is a leadership position. Logically, the dialogue should be two-way exchange. The leader of the light can not reflect the real thoughts of the masses. Third, he can not persuade himself to use the methods of conversation and persevere with the truth. The masses do not buy your account. As a result, the workers said: “Such a dialogue will never be attended in the future.” Whether it is for ideological and political work