加害给付是大陆法系传统契约——侵权两分债法体系的“边缘问题”。它的核心问题在于合同义务能否延伸到未经当事人约定的当事一般人人身、财产法益的保护;保护义务能否及如何纳入侵权法调整。解决此类问题的困难肇源于债法发展中形成的“意思主义”和“过错责任”理论。加害给付法律规制路径的选择也反映了债法在20世纪的新的发展趋势。 Injury payment is the traditional contract of the civil law system - the “edge problem” of the tort law system of infringement. Its core issue lies in whether the contractual obligation can be extended to the protection of the legal interests of the general public and property interests of the parties without the agreement of the parties; and whether the obligation of protection can be incorporated into the regulation of tort law. The difficulty of solving such problems originates from the theory of “meaning doctrine” and “fault liability” formed in the development of debt law. The choice of the path of legal regulation of injurious payment also reflects the new development trend of debt law in the 20th century.