论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】以胁迫手段订立的合同,因为损害国家利益、意思表示不真实而无效或可以撤销,但认定影响合同效力的胁迫,应当同时具备胁迫故意、胁迫行为、违法性以及因果关系四个要件。债权人仅以尾随、纠缠的方式催索债务并不构成胁迫,人民法院应当认定为合法的权利行使行为。□案号一审:(2015)万法民初字第10号二审:(2015)渝二中法民终字第1980号
The purpose of the referee The contract concluded by coercion, because it is damaging to the national interest, the meaning is untrue and invalid or can be withdrawn, but the coercive force that affects the validity of the contract shall have coercive intentionality, coercion, illegality and causation Requirements. Creditors only trailing, entangled way to search for debt does not constitute coercion, the people’s court should be recognized as a legitimate right to exercise. □ Case No. First instance: (2015) Wan Famin Min Chu Zi No.10 Second instance: (2015) Yu II Zhongfa Min Zhong Zi No. 1980