斯特劳森是一位杰出的语言分析哲学家,对心灵问题有着自己的独特的见解。不过他的心灵哲学思想是伴随着他对于形而上学的理解和日常语言用法的语词分析展开的。他认为精神和物质这些概念只有赋予人这个原初的概念才能得到正确的理解。他批判了笛卡尔的二元论者,认为它的心灵的实体是空洞抽象的,阻断了逻辑的传递性;而维特根斯坦的无所有论者又否认了经验主体的存在,造成了人的经验的赋予的困难。对于他心知问题,他认为人只有把意识状态、经验等赋予他人才能赋予自己,才能保证他人心灵的认知成为可能。对于心身因果性问题,他认为同一论中的同一概念是一种误用,它应该应用于主体或人的概念之上,而不是事件,只有这样才能既满足物理描述和心灵描述各自有限的效用,又满足它们之间的因果关系。 Strawson is an outstanding linguistic analytic philosopher who has his own unique view of the problem of the mind. However, his philosophy of mind and philosophy was accompanied by his analysis of metaphysics and the use of words in daily language usage. He believes that the concepts of spirit and matter can only be correctly understood if they are given the original concept. He criticized Descartes’ dualism as the entity of his mind empty of abstraction, blocking the transitivity of logic, and Wittgenstein’s non-opinionist denied the existence of the subject of experience and created human experience The difficulty of giving. For his knowledge of the problem, he believes that people can only give their own state of mind, experience and other empowerment, in order to ensure that other people’s spiritual cognition possible. For the psychosomatic cause-and-effect problem, he thinks the same concept in the same theory is a kind of misuse, which should be applied to the concept of the subject or person instead of the event. Only in this way can both the physical description and the spiritual description satisfy their respective limited utility , But also to meet the causal relationship between them.