论文部分内容阅读
王兆本老师在《岂能以是否挨骂论英雄》(见1990年第10期《语文教学与研究》)一文中,指责《内蒙访古》的作者说: “赵武灵王是一个英雄,无可否认。然而翦老用‘没有挨骂’作为标准之一来评价赵武灵王,不能不说是一个小小的疏忽。因为这不是唯物史观”。对王老师的这个批评,笔者认为脱离了原文的实际,是一种断章取义的批评! 翦老在文中论英雄的标准究竟是什么?请读原文吧: “当然,我说赵武灵王是一个英雄,不仅仅是因为他筑了一条长城,更重要的是因
In an article titled “Analyzing Heroes with Reliance on Heroes” (see the tenth issue of Language Teaching and Research, 1990), Wang Zhaoben’s author accused the author of “Internal Mongolia Visiting Ancients”: “Zhao Wuling is a hero and it is undeniable. However, in the evaluation of Zhao Wuling as one of the criteria, “I have no guilt” is not a negligence, because this is not a historical materialism.” Regarding Wang’s criticism, I believe that it is out of line with the actual situation and it is a criticism out of context! What is the standard of the hero in the article? Please read the original text: “Of course, I said that Zhao Wuling is a hero. Not only because he built a Great Wall, but more importantly because