论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨喜炎平治疗小儿上呼吸道感染的临床效果分析。方法:选取2013年1月～2013年6月来我院接受治疗的50例上呼吸道感染患儿的临床资料,随机将其分为观察组和对照组各25例,观察组采用利巴韦林注射液稀释滴注治疗,对照组采用喜炎平注射液稀释滴注治疗,对两组患者的治疗效果进行比较分析。结果:观察组患儿3天内退热率为60%,对照组为88%。在经过1周的治疗以后,观察组显效的有10例,有效的有8例,无效的有7例,总有效率为72%,而对照组显效的有15例,有效的有9例,无效的有1例,总有效率为96%,P<0.05。在两组患儿出现的不良反应上,对照组有1例患儿出现了轻微的腹泻情况,而观察组轻微腹泻患儿有4例,呕吐的患儿有2例,暂停使用药物治疗后不良症状都消失。无论在3天内退热情况、总有效率还是不良反应上,对照组都明显好于观察组。结论:采用喜炎平治疗小儿上呼吸道感染治疗效果良好,轻微的不良反应极少,因此值得在临床上广泛推广和应用。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of Xiyanping on children with upper respiratory tract infection. Methods: From January 2013 to June 2013 to our hospital for treatment of 50 cases of upper respiratory tract infection in children with clinical data were randomly divided into observation group and control group of 25 cases, the observation group using ribavirin Injection diluted infusion therapy, the control group with Xiyanping injection dilution infusion treatment, the two groups of patients treated by a comparative analysis. Results: In the observation group, the fever rate was 60% within 3 days and 88% in the control group. After one week of treatment, the observation group was significantly effective in 10 cases, 8 cases were effective, 7 cases were ineffective, the total effective rate was 72%, while the control group was markedly effective in 15 cases, effective in 9 cases, In 1 case, the total effective rate was 96%, P <0.05. In the two groups of children with adverse reactions, the control group, 1 patient had a slight diarrhea, while the observation group of mild diarrhea in 4 children, vomiting in children with 2 cases, the suspension of drug treatment after the poor Symptoms are gone. No matter in 3 days fever, the total efficiency or adverse reactions, the control group were significantly better than the observation group. Conclusion: Xiyanping treatment of children with upper respiratory tract infection treatment effect is good, minimal adverse reactions, it is worth widely in clinical application.