论文部分内容阅读
最近在党的八届八中全会公报和决议的学习中,对1958年以来水利水电勘测设计工作的某些问题曾引起了一些争论,暴露了许多不同的看法。现就大家辩论的几个主要问题谈谈我个人的看法。(一)勘测设计工作要不要大搞羣众运动?有人认为用羣众运动搞生产是有缺点的,这些缺点是永远不可避免的。他们认为以运动推动生产,有五大坏处,①计划容易打乱;②质量不高;③浪费时间;④学习被挤掉;⑤不能正常生产。按照这样的论点,就只有一条:取消在设计部门中大搞羣众运动,取消以运动的方式推动生产。这种观点是十分错误的,其所以错误,在于对待羣众运动丝毫没有马克思主义的观点,不承认羣众是历史的主人。我们说,羣众是生产的创造者,要推动生产,就得轰轰烈烈地闹羣众运动。周总理在人大二届常委会上所作的报告中
Recently, during the study of the communiques and resolutions of the Eighth Plenary Session of the Eighth Party Congress, some controversies have arisen about the issue of the survey and design of water conservancy and hydropower projects since 1958, and many different views have been exposed. Let me now talk about my personal views on some of the major issues of debate. (1) Do surveys and design work involve large-scale mass movements? Some people think that it is flawed to engage in mass production to engage in production. These shortcomings are always inevitable. They believe that the use of sports to promote production, there are five major disadvantages, 1 plan is easy to disrupt; 2 quality is not high; 3 wasting time; 4 learning was squeezed out; 5 can not be normal production. According to this argument, there is only one: cancellation of the mass movement in the design department, and the elimination of the use of sports to promote production. This view is very erroneous. Its mistake is to treat the mass movement with no Marxist viewpoint or to recognize that the masses are the masters of history. We said that the masses are the creators of production. If we want to promote production, we must vigorously stir the mass movement. Premier Zhou in the report of the second standing committee of the National People’s Congress