论文部分内容阅读
1988年国家劳动部在甘肃省试行GB5817—86生产性粉尘作业危害程度分级的普查普测分级工作,至今已取得了丰富的经验,即将准备在全国推广执行。我局劳动卫生监测经省劳动安全卫生监察检测部门的考核认可后,在社会上和本局系统内做了相当量的生产性粉尘作业危害程度分级的监测分级工作,在实践中,遇到了一些现象,在此作一些业务性的评述,谬误之处,请同行们、专家们给予指教。一、消除非技术性因素的干扰,使生产性粉尘作业危害程度分级结果具有真实的代表性生产性粉尘作业危害程度分级国家标准,(以下简称分级标准)与车间空气中有害物质的最高容许浓度这一卫生标准,既有一定的联系,又有一定的区别;卫生标准是指工人在这
In 1988, the Ministry of Labor of the People’s Republic of China promulgated the general survey and grading work of grading of hazardous dust for operation of GB5817-86 in Gansu Province. So far, it has obtained rich experience and is going to be ready to be promoted throughout the country. After examination and approval by the Labor Safety and Health Inspection and Testing Department under our bureau, a considerable amount of monitoring and grading work has been done within the society and within our bureau system to classify the degrees of harmfulness of productive dust operations. In practice, some phenomena have been encountered , Here for some business reviews, fallacies, please colleagues, experts give advice. First, eliminate the interference of non-technical factors, so that the dust produced by the operation of the degree of grading results have a real representative of the degree of dust produced by the operation of the national standards, (hereinafter referred to as the grading standards) and the maximum allowable concentration of harmful substances in the air workshop A health standard, both a certain link, there are some differences; health standards refers to the workers here