论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察抗生素联合体外短波热疗法治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床疗效。方法:选择慢性盆腔炎465例,随机分为观察组230例和对照组235例。对照组给予左氧氟沙星0.4g加奥硝唑0.4g静脉滴注,每天1次;观察组在对照组基础上加用体外短波电容场热疗仪进行热疗,每次30min。治疗14天后观察比较两组临床疗效。结果:观察组治愈166例,占72.2%;显效41例,占17.8%;有效14例,占6.1%;无效9例,占3.9%;总有效率96.1%。对照组治愈76例,占32.3%;显效82例,占34.9%;有效38例,占16.2%;无效39例,占16.6%;总有效率83.4%。观察组总有效率非常显著高于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:抗生素联合体外短波热疗法治疗慢性盆腔炎的疗效优于单纯抗生素治疗。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of antibiotics combined with short-wave hyperthermia in treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Methods: 465 cases of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease were randomly divided into observation group (230 cases) and control group (235 cases). The control group was given levofloxacin 0.4g plus ornidazole 0.4g intravenously once a day; the observation group was treated with short-wave capacitive hyperthermia apparatus on the basis of the control group for 30 minutes. After 14 days of treatment, the clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed and compared. Results: The observation group cured 166 cases, accounting for 72.2%; 41 cases markedly, accounting for 17.8%; effective in 14 cases, accounting for 6.1%; ineffective in 9 cases, accounting for 3.9%; the total effective rate was 96.1%. The control group cured 76 cases, accounting for 32.3%; 82 cases markedly effective, accounting for 34.9%; effective in 38 cases, accounting for 16.2%; ineffective in 39 cases, accounting for 16.6%; the total effective rate was 83.4%. The total effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P <0.01). Conclusion: Antibiotics combined with short-wave hyperthermia in vitro is superior to antibiotics in the treatment of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease.