本期审判长认为；一、被告是一种滥用行政职权的行力。理由如下：第一、本案中被告的封行为主观上并非是执行国家赋予的职权，而是借此收费。依据《产品质量法》及有关法律规定，技术监督局虽有权查或怀疑质量不合格的产品，仅查封后应在规定的期限内作出检验结论，一般情况应? The presiding judge thinks: First, the defendant is an abuse of administrative authority. The reasons are as follows: First, in the present case, the defendant’s seal is subjectively not the authority given by the executive state, but charges instead. According to the “Product Quality Law” and the relevant laws and regulations, although the Bureau of Technical Supervision has the right to check or suspect the quality of substandard products, only after the seizure should be made within the prescribed time limit test conclusion, the general situation should be?