“全面当事人主义化”以被告人利益为基点,忽视社会公共安全和被害人权益,否定检察机关法律监督权,既未顺应国际诉讼理念的变动和发展趋势,更不适合中国的历史传统和现实基础。中国刑事诉讼模式的择取应从中国的实际出发,借鉴和吸纳符合司法实践需要的有益经验,而不应局限于大陆法系国家的职权主义或是英美法系国家的当事人主义模式。 “All-party advocacy” takes the interests of defendants as the starting point, neglects social public safety and victims’ rights and interests, and negates the legal supervisory power of procuratorial organs. It neither adapts to the changes and trends in the concept of international lawsuit, nor does it fit the historical traditions of China. Realistic foundation. The selection of China’s criminal litigation model should start from the reality of China, learn from and incorporate useful experiences that meet the needs of judicial practice, and should not be limited to the civil rights system in civil law countries or the advocacy model in common law countries.